Sunday, May 15, 2011

Popularity of melatonin desserts unsettling for doctors

Remember melatonin? In the 1990s, this over-the-counter dietary supplement was all the rage among frequent fliers, promoted as the miracle cure for jet lag. Now it is back in vogue, this time as a prominent ingredient in at least a half-dozen baked goods that flagrantly mimic the soothing effects of hash brownies — and do so legally. At least for now.
With names like Lazy Cakes, Kush Cakes, and Lulla Pies, these products are sold online and at stores such as 7-Eleven, Walgreens, smoke shops, and even at the Harvard Coop, the university’s student bookstore, for roughly $3 to $4 each. (A bottle of 60 8-milligram melatonin tablets costs about $11.) At some places, the drug-laced desserts can be paid for with food stamps.
Although the Food and Drug Administration has not approved melatonin as a food additive or deemed it safe, the dessert makers are marketing their products as a harmless way to promote relaxation.
The snacks are increasingly being endorsed by fans on Facebook and Twitter as an antidote to stress and sleep deprivation. (Who needs yoga?) On the Facebook page for Lazy Cakes, one woman who said she has bipolar disorder wrote that the treat “helps a lot with my sleeping and panic attacks I can lay off my Xanax a little.’’
Gabby Bevel, 22, a writer from Norman, Okla., and an insomniac who took Ambien and Lunesta in high school, said in an interview that she slept 13 hours after eating one Lazy Cakes snack recently. “I don’t like the idea of needing something unnatural to help me with anything,’’ she said. “Really, I think part of the appeal is it does come in a brownie.’’
But these products contain roughly 8 milligrams of melatonin per brownie or cookie, so selling them is similar to a parent serving an unsuspecting child applesauce containing a crushed aspirin tablet to make it go down easier.
“It’s making it much more difficult for the consumer to recognize that they are taking a drug,’’ said Dr. Charles A. Czeisler, the chief of the division of sleep medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Nick Collado, a 26-year-old insomniac and the founder of Lulla Pies, argued that the melatonin they contain, while synthetic, is more “natural’’ than the Ambien he used to take. “I realized there’s got to be more people like me who don’t want to take prescription drugs anymore, who want to take an alternative,’’ Collado said.
But Dr. David S. Seres, the director of medical nutrition at Columbia Medical Center, cautioned that consumers should consult their doctors before trying such products.
“The promoters of these are appealing to people who think it’s better to do things outside of the medical establishment,’’ he said, adding that “the desire to help people is an extremely strong motivator, but so is money.’’
Seres pointed to a section of the National Institutes of Health’s website that lists several drugs, including sedatives such as clonazepam and birth control pills, whose efficacy might be altered by melatonin.
“A hangover effect has been reported’’ with large doses, said Anna Rouse Dulaney, a toxicologist with the Carolinas Poison Center.
Lazy Cakes appear harmless, even amusing, with swirly purple packaging; Kush Cakes have a tie-dye-printed wrapper. But they are not to be underestimated.
Of melatonin, Seres warned, “If you take it while you’re driving a car, you will find yourself in a ditch.’’
Maybe. Dr. Alfred J. Lewy, a professor of psychiatry at Oregon Health and Science University who has studied melatonin, a neurohormone, estimated that only a third of the population is susceptible to its effects in a supplement.
Some medical professionals are concerned that the chocolate taste of the desserts might encourage indiscriminate gobbling.
“It’s a colossally bad idea to put melatonin in food,’’ Czeisler said. “It should not be permitted by the FDA.’’
Technically, it is not. Stephanie Yao, a spokeswoman at the FDA, wrote in an e-mail that any item that uses melatonin as an additive “may be subject to regulatory action.’’
That is why the makers of these new baked goods label them “not for food use.’’ They want them to be considered dietary supplements, which do not need the FDA’s premarket approval and are not required to be proved safe or effective.

No comments:

Post a Comment